The above image is an illustrative representation, created with AI and does not depict actual individuals or events.
Greater Noida, February 18, 2026 — A technology showcase at the India AI Impact Summit turned contentious after Galgotias University was asked to vacate its stall following objections over the display of a Chinese‑made robotic dog.
The device, identified as the Unitree Go2, drew attention for its advanced mobility and sensing features. However, criticism arose when some attendees believed the university had presented the machine as an in‑house development rather than an imported platform. The incident quickly spread across professional circles, raising questions about attribution standards in research exhibitions.
University officials later issued a clarification, stating that the misunderstanding stemmed from how the terms develop and development were used during demonstrations. Registrar Nitin Kumar Gaur explained that the institution’s role was limited to application‑level work, testing scenarios, and integration experiments using the robodog, not manufacturing the hardware itself.
Professor Neha Singh, associated with the demonstration, added that her description of the system as “ours” referred to the project setup and research applications being carried out by the team, not the original production of the device. She acknowledged that the fast‑paced exhibition environment may have contributed to the confusion.
Summit organizers intervened after receiving complaints and requested the university team to withdraw from the floor to prevent further dispute. The episode has since sparked wider discussion in academic and startup communities about how imported technology platforms should be labeled when used in research and student projects.
University representatives emphasized their commitment to transparent communication and pledged to adopt clearer display descriptions in future exhibitions to avoid similar misunderstandings.
